How about I give you all a call, I'll just tell you who I am. If that's what you really want. But why can't a guy (?) have a normal political conversation without all the added speculation? I have yet to post any info online of any of you, with the exception of Sabrina I thought you were more like Braeden and Angela and more open with your real name. My apologies. I know you can track my IP address, Angela, I have a couple documented cases where you did it before. I need to have a talk with Brad about this soon, I don’t think it's quite on the up and up, you made some people very unhappy. I thought there was something in the policy against that, let me know if I'm wrong. Also, Brandie, be more careful with what you put online. I'm DoD as well, you're not supposed to put departure and arrival times for units online and open source. It's bad practice.

Now important issue of the day, I think everyone should go on glassbooth. Might solve some of these problems.

Hello,

Talk about idiocy. Goodness. Why are you capitalizing "National Security" is it some sort of holy idol or something? and "our efforts overseas"? Please? "Selective engagement"? More nuevo-military speak? If you do, indeed, work for the DoD I hope you are near retirement. The best thing we could do internationaly is learn we are in this world together.

Be well and BTW, So Daiho Hilbert is my real name Bows to you.

Please link to where I have done this because I am certain I have not. If you can show me where I have I will give you a full and humble apology.

I'm very aware of OPSEC.

Haha, yes and talk to Brad. I'm sure you know him personally. I love how you throw out first names. Awesome.

He reminds me of Andy Bernard.

"I'm going to get to the top here by personality mirroring and name repetition" . . .

nataliedee.com

Sodaiho,
I apologize for using all those military "slang" words, I must be brainwashed by hearing about people who try to kill us daily.

"The best thing we could do internationally is learn we are in this world together."

Uh-huh.....you keep saving those whales man. Let me ask you a question. If you don't agree with a selective engagement approach to overseas resolution when regarding national securities and interest, what do you propose? You seem like the kind of guy who wants to hold hands and talk about differences, then hug and make up. Let me give you a hint, next time you visit the middle east, go hold the hand of the guy running at you yelling "Allahu Akbar".

"Be well and BTW, So Daiho Hilbert is my real name Bows to you."

Great, try not to make enemies, remember with a full name and DOB one can find a SS#. Protect that credit man... Be Well.

And I like Andy, he's a funny guy.

haahahaha

Know what's funny about this? Last night I was thinking maybe I'll just pencil myself in as President when I vote. And wouldn't it be hilarious if I voted first and all the voting machines were netted together...some bug put my name on every single ballot in the US...and then people said, hey I'm voting for this Tova person because (insert reason)...and then WA-LA I won!

I could make JU my cabinet.

hahahahaha





Nah, I really wouldn't want the job.

Nice. But only the logical ones, please.

After thinking about this, I've come to one conclusion:

Though I hate Mike Huckabee, and most of the other candidates aren't much better, the President of the United States doesn't really do a whole lot. I mean, he/she has a cabinet full of advisors, speech writers, assistants, the CIA, the FBI, the Secret Service, not to mention all of Congress. With all of these people around, the President really can't change a whole lot. Can he?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but a lot of the issues the candidates are fighting about are issues that have to go through Congress before a change can be made. So as long as there is a RATIONAL individual as President, who does it matter who it is?

The trick here, of course, is to put someone in office that is open to new ideas, change, and doing what the people want, not what he/she wants. Right?

Regardless of race, sex, OR religion.

I wouldn't vote for Romney or Huckabee, either. But not because of religion. I just don't think either of them is the best candidate for the job. I think religion, while important to individuals as it should be, has played far too large a role in this race for the presidency.

Huckabee is, as has been stated by both you, Whip, and San Chonino, in short, a very bad man. I read your article about him and the whole "pardoning" of convicted rapists, and the favoritism he displayed toward crappy guitarists, and I don't want a man like that "running" the country.

As for Mitt, I don't like his politics, simple as that. He can't make a decision, and I think he's trying to be the next Kennedy. I don't like him. But for different reasons than Huckabee.

By the way, Wallace, keep your mind off of my panties, sicko. Little pervert.

Say what?  And, how did I get pulled into this?

Anyway, since you act like you have a clue of who I am and who Brad is...then you surely know that I am the VP of Operations at the company that owns this site so I have access to all the records pertaining to this site.  It's not like it's hard to find my company profile on the main Stardock site or anything...here, I'll even point it out: https://www.stardock.com/about/management.asp

How would you have "records" of me "tracking" your IP?  All I did was simply look you up in the database.  lol 

And, yes, that is "up and up" and fully within my legal rights as an officer of this corporation.

But, feel free to chat with Brad.  It will give us something to chuckle about in our next meeting.  It would go something like this:

Brad: Who is this "WallaceStevens" character, anyway?
Me: Just some clueless dude on JU.
Brad: Why is he emailing me?
Me: Not sure....I guess he's just some clueless dude.  BTW, he has an alter ego.  Maybe we should ban him?

I think you see how these things go.  It's a privately owned site.  If you annoy the hell out of us, you leave.  m'kay?  'nuff said.

 

*comment removed by admin* Note to all: insult and post private info about an admin- you get banned. This is a privately owned site. You have no "rights" to be here. Admins do not tolerate being harassed, threatened or insulted.

Dude, Wallace.

You're about the least intelligent person I've encountered on here. Calling the VP of Stardock unintelligent to her face?

Now that's audacity.

I was going to blacklist you now that Brad says he's got it working again, but what's the point? Karma's probably going to ban your ass from this site, anyway.

Chones- you were going to blacklist me? It's ok for you to go after other people, but when one comes after you..... Stop being a girl, no wonder why you can't get one.

Same to you sabrina, can there be a bigger hypocrite, you modern day Pharisee. You are probably the worst of them all. It's almost like I hurt your feelings, but will that stop you from ragging on more people....probably not. I've never met two people so proud, when they have nothing, as I do with you and flipper. But I must say, you people on JU have provided me with some entertainment over the last year. I also got a good feeling about my life, by hearing about yours makes me smile I'm not you.