Self-deprecation is worth its weight in smoldering phoenix-ashes and baby unicorn tears.
or; so I feel.
Published on June 21, 2007 By SanChonino In US Domestic
Once again, President Bush has vetoed a bill regarding funding for stem cell research, calling the research "unethical".

I've gotten into this before on this site, and I still don't understand President Bush's position. These stem cells are going to be flushed down the toilet. Put them to good use.

I already know the reaction I'm going to get from the majority of the people on this site - "why should federal funding go to any research, regardless of how it's funded?"

My answer? Because I said so, dammit.

President Bush, you're tacky and I hate you. (Name the movie reference.)


Where Are The Dogs Humping.com

Comments (Page 1)
4 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Jun 21, 2007
this is what will happen if this bill ever becomes law.

the pharmaceutical companies will start paying women to get pregnet so they can abort the baby to use for research purposes that is what the president is talking about. besides he isn't saying the research can't be done he is saying not on the publics dime
on Jun 21, 2007
SC:
This man is an idiot. or; so I feel.

Apparently I'm an idiot too, because I have got ethical qualms about embryonic stem cell research too.

These stem cells are going to be flushed down the toilet. Put them to good use.

So in for a penny, in for a pound? Since we're creating these embryos we may as well use them, even if it's not for human life? All I can do is shake my head and wonder what happened to the sanctity of life.

Danielost:
the pharmaceutical companies will start paying women to get pregnet so they can abort the baby to use for research purposes

Umm... eww. And, no. I don't think anyone's warning against that. Sounds like you've been watching too many of them sci-fi movies.

he isn't saying the research can't be done he is saying not on the publics dime

Yes. In fact, research is best done on the public dime.

Adult stem cell research is bearing huge fruit and fetal stem cells are causing major problems in recipients. To solve the fetal stem cell problem, feel free to throw some money at it. But please don't let it be MY money.
on Jun 21, 2007
I agree with his ban on funding but not his reasoning. He should ban the funding because the US Government isn't supposed to be a giant piggy bank for every cause, not because of the ethics of it. BUT he should do so while cutting a whole host of other programs as well.

I would agree stem cell research is equally deserving of federal funding as many other government projects. But in this case, when I say "equally deserving", I mean "not at all deserving".

Daniel,

I'm more afraid of them paying women to produce fetuses to make Soylent Green than I am of them paying women to produce fetuses for stem cell research. But in this case, when I say "more afraid", I mean "not at all afraid".
on Jun 21, 2007
President Bush, you're tacky and I hate you


hahahahaha school of rock! The gay kid, he's one of my favourite characters. Do I win a prize?
on Jun 21, 2007
Oh and I support stem cell research just like I'm pro-choice (not pro-death as some of my friends would call it....I think they were joking....maybe). However, I am not pro government-spend-all-my-money either. I agree with Gid, cut fundings, but not becase it's unethical. Do it because we're like, 50 trillion dollars in debt.
on Jun 21, 2007
I agree with his ban on funding but not his reasoning. He should ban the funding because the US Government isn't supposed to be a giant piggy bank for every cause, not because of the ethics of it. BUT he should do so while cutting a whole host of other programs as well.


Gid, I disagree with you on this part. I think it's important to have funding for research that is independent of any kind of company or industry. It's a great thing to experiment with an end purpose in mind, but it's also good to research and experiment for the sake of increasing knowledge. I believe that some ideas need to be pursued regardless of the question of, "Gee, that's interesting, but how is it going to make money and how long will it take to pay off?" I think that countries that provide for this kind of research have an edge in terms of technological advances.

Having said this, I need to say that I'm not American so I don't have any vested interest in where the US government spends it's money. I would agree, though, that governments tend to be bloated with unnecessary programs and that not every single idea should be given funding.

I know that I'm pretty idealistic in this regard.
on Jun 21, 2007
I agree with not using our money when those who can profit from the findings have more than enough to fund it themselves. Especially when they are not being stopped by laws. Bush has not made it illegal to use the embryos, only not to use Gov't funding to do so.
on Jun 21, 2007

These stem cells are going to be flushed down the toilet. Put them to good use.

That's basically what the Nazis said about using Jews for medical experiments too (and it was just as true).  Do you or have you supported that research?

For a person that believes life begins at conception, it is the same thing.

on Jun 21, 2007
My answer? Because I said so, dammit.


I'm sorry did someone say something? I thought I heard a small sound, guess it was just my imagination.
on Jun 21, 2007
we want to throw money at the stem cell research for research purposes.

but we also want to cut funding to nasa which does nothing but research and we all benefit from nasas research in one way or another.

on Jun 21, 2007
A few people have thrown around the phrase "sanctity of life". I guess it all depends on where, exactly, you believe that "life" begins.

Is it at conception (as Guy and singrdave must believe)?

Is it when the cells start to differentiate (as most those who believe in the use of stem-cells but consider themselves pro-life believe)?

Is it when junior pops out and starts his screaming?
on Jun 21, 2007
President Bush, you're tacky and I hate you


hahahahaha school of rock! The gay kid, he's one of my favourite characters. Do I win a prize?


Yay! You win the "SanChonino's favorite blogger" prize! Your commemorative t-shirt is in the mail.
on Jun 21, 2007
Not deliberately at least.


  for a moment I was about to correct that.
on Jun 21, 2007
The federal government already funds stem cell research SC, and there is no ban on private companies doing all the stem cell research on embryos they want. The only ban there is on a federal level is funding experimenting with embryo stem cells.

Plus since you are all hot to trot about this, name me a cure stem cell have made.
name me anything stem cells have done to advance medicine. NOT something that MIGHT advance, something concrete.
on Jun 21, 2007

Once again, President Bush has vetoed a bill regarding funding for stem cell research, calling the research "unethical".

I've gotten into this before on this site, and I still don't understand President Bush's position. These stem cells are going to be flushed down the toilet. Put them to good use.

I already know the reaction I'm going to get from the majority of the people on this site - "why should federal funding go to any research, regardless of how it's funded?"

My answer? Because I said so, dammit.

President Bush, you're tacky and I hate you. (Name the movie reference.)


I would like for you to do me a favor. Name just ONE advance in medicine that embryonic stem cell research has produced. Now I can give you the answer in one word, "NONE"! On the the other hand adult stem cell research has produced about 75 such advances. BTW...you are not required to understand or even agree with Bush's position on the subject.
4 Pages1 2 3  Last