Self-deprecation is worth its weight in smoldering phoenix-ashes and baby unicorn tears.
or; not really. But it was GOING to be.
Published on November 30, 2007 By SanChonino In Biology
If there's one thing you need to know about me, I have no patience for stupidity. In fact, it's one of the most infuriating things I encounter on a regular basis. Few things will cause me to fly off on someone quicker than their foolishness.

Now, usually in person, I hide this absolute contempt beneath a veneer of niceties; I maintain my cool, and keep from getting out of control. (If there's one thing I can do better than most anyone, it's keep my cool – just ask Cedarbird, because it pisses her off.) Most of the idiotic horde have no idea of the boiling rage bubbling right beneath the smile.

But in an anonymous setting like the internet, I don't feel as compelled to pull my punches – because, frankly, chances are mighty slim I'll ever see any of you retards face to face. Thus, what is my motivation to not tell you exactly how I feel? Exactly – I have none.

Yet still, more often than not, I find myself pulling my punches online, just like I do in a face-to-face setting. And it begs the question: why?

Why do I continue to attempt to foster a friendly relationship with people I can't stand?

Why do I suffer these idiots, without telling them exactly how I feel?

This is a question I genuinely want the answer to. In the meantime, I'm gonna be an ever bigger snot than I have previously. So, yeah. Not sorry.

If I correct your spelling or grammar, rather than discuss the “points” you made in your article or post – your happy crappy was completely undeserving of my attention, so I'll get my jollies out of ridiculing your horrible “English”.

If I call you names, know that I mean every single one of them.

When you miss the boat in my or another's post, I'm going to make fun of you. (If it's my post, I'm really going to make fun of you. And your mother.)

(And to think: this article began as a discussion about the merits of Eugenics. Yes, I'm an elitist pig.)

Hame hovit.

Comments
on Nov 30, 2007
Apparently your parents should have practiced a little Eugenics of there own. ;~D
on Nov 30, 2007
Now, usually in person, I hide this absolute contempt beneath a veneer of niceties; I maintain my cool, and keep from getting out of control. (If there's one thing I can do better than most anyone, it's keep my cool – just ask Cedarbird, because it pisses her off.)


True story. It's fascinatingly annoying to get into an argument with you.
on Nov 30, 2007
I am quite stoic most of the time. I brush off stupid people and find someone with a higher IQ than a stick of butter. I feel your pain. Rarely do I ever fly off the handle in a passionate (albeit justified) rant to a person's face about why they're stupid.

My favorite way of irritating the hell out of people is casually playing the Devil's Advocate. Damn, that's fun.

~Zoo
on Nov 30, 2007
If there's one thing you need to know about me, I have no patience for stupidity. In fact, it's one of the most ingratiating things I encounter on a regular basis. Few things will cause me to fly off on someone quicker than their foolishness.


So, San Chonino thinks he can get a Ninja edit in on me.

This is what the article originally started as. Now I have to make fun of his "English". Especially since I was the one to point out the odd use of the word "ingratiating". Silly boy.
on Nov 30, 2007
Mwah hahahahahahahahaha!!!!!

Eat that, brother-man!
on Nov 30, 2007
This is what the article originally started as. Now I have to make fun of his "English". Especially since I was the one to point out the odd use of the word "ingratiating". Silly boy.


That's where you're wrong, brother-man. Originally, the article stated "ingratiating" because, at times, it pleases me to see people act like total rondo fools. However, lately, it's been more "infuriating" than "ingratiating".

Perhaps an amalgamation of the both. Punk.
on Nov 30, 2007
I was here, I read, and I moved on.
on Nov 30, 2007
'Originally, the article stated "ingratiating" because, at times, it pleases me to see people act like total rondo fools.'

Ooh, poor save. If you did use 'ingratiating' deliberately, it was obviously only because you didn't know what it means. In the context in which you employed it, it completely negated the sense of the preceding sentence. (Did you think it had something to do with being 'grating', perhaps?)

But maybe I can help you get your grammatical account back in the black. You haven't yet picked up on ParaTed2k for using the wrong homophone.   

on Nov 30, 2007
Ooh, poor save.


Very. And he knows it. But I had to try. It was unintentional, just a typo. That's what happens when you write articles at 2 in the morning. (That's not when I posted it, but when I wrote it.)

You haven't yet picked up on ParaTed2k for using the wrong homophone.


I picked up on it, I'm just lazy. I'm still riding off the optimism of Quijote. Give me a couple weeks, and the misanthropy will arise with a dark, black vengeance.

End of the world style, folks. End of the world.
on Dec 01, 2007
But maybe I can help you get your grammatical account back in the black. You haven't yet picked up on ParaTed2k for using the wrong homophone.


Their They're. ;~D
on Dec 01, 2007
End of the world.


No big loss.
on Dec 01, 2007

But maybe I can help you get your grammatical account back in the black. You haven't yet picked up on ParaTed2k for using the wrong homophone.


Their They're. ;~D



Actually, it's "their."

on Dec 04, 2007
I have to say most times it is better for your own stress levels to simply ignore these daily encounters with the dense. I too feel the same way about them but I really do try these days not to let them get to me. It is a lot harder to do than to say, though. I sympathise with you, for sure.