Self-deprecation is worth its weight in smoldering phoenix-ashes and baby unicorn tears.
or; science in the time of the "inquisition"
Published on February 2, 2006 By SanChonino In Religion
I don't know how many of you are familiar with the state of Utah, but if there's one thing Utah has going for it, it's lots of Mormons. They make up over half the population of the state, after all. Now, that's not a bad thing, don't get me wrong - I do happen to be one myself, so I can't go hating on the population of which I am a part - but it does lend itself to a lot of closed-mindedness. Currently up on "the Hill", where the State Capitol building is, there is a bill that a Sen. Buttars is trying to push that would remove most of the teaching of evolution in the classroom in biology classes, and also discuss "alternative ideas", a.k.a. "intelligent design", a.k.a. "I'm going to shove Creationism down your throat even in school".
Now, I understand that this man has some serious religious beliefs; there's nothing wrong with that. But - to teach intelligent design in the classroom? I was always under the impression that that was more of a sabbath school topic, not one to be discussed in the high school. But there is an awful lot of support for this bill. People are rallying around it, making it a call to arms in the name of "true religion", and simply embarrasing the heck out of me. As I said, I do happen to patronize the Mormon church. But does that mean that I can't also believe in evolution? Who's to say that that isn't what God used to "intelligently design" everything anyway? Needless to say, I'm bothered by it. Evolution - yeah, there's some pretty serious circumstantial evidence supporting it. God? Sorry, that evidence is in my heart. It's all mine. I can't prove the existence of God to anyone - so why confuse the poor high school kids with all these alternate ideas? I say, keep evolution in the classroom, and creationism in the Sunday school.

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 06, 2006
Thank you, Furry. It means a lot. I didn't mean to offend anyone, I didn't mean to "deepen the divide", as Gideon ensued, I just wanted to explain something.
My friend was telling me of a group in Kansas that started a joke church that "believed" that the universe was created by a spaghetti-and-meatballs creature that pretty much made us out of marinara sauce. But - now, they have a huge following on the internet; it's become a "theory held by a minority of Americans". Just a thought. Do we teach that, too?
on Feb 07, 2006
'Thank you, Furry. It means a lot. I didn't mean to offend anyone, I didn't mean to "deepen the divide", as Gideon ensued, I just wanted to explain something.'

I find it very heartening to learn the views of somebody who is (unlike me) a believer, but (like me) concerned about a perceived blurring of the boundaries between science and religion - specifically, what I believe to be attempts to make certain religious dogma 'fit' into the scientific model, and thus (among other things) eligible for debate in respect of being included in school science curriculum content. This is certainly not appropriate, and absolutely not necessary, in that it does neither science nor faith any favours.

But now I'm just repeating myself. Thanks for the comments San Chonino. I think you DID explain yourself, and very well too. More power to your elbow.
2 Pages1 2