Self-deprecation is worth its weight in smoldering phoenix-ashes and baby unicorn tears.
or; nine thousand dollars a song?!?
Published on October 5, 2007 By SanChonino In Music
News today is that there's a lady in Minnesota who finally stood up to the record companies' ridiculous and draconian copyright rules.

And what does she get for it?

220,000 dollars in fines. For 24 songs she supposedly downloaded.

Yeah, that's a little over 9,000 dollars a song.

Now, I understand that the record companies' goal was to make an example of the single mother of two, but she maintains her innocence - that she was neither involved in downloading or uploading music. And besides, 9,000 dollars a song? Seems a bit ridiculous.

But I only see this as making those of us who may or may not participate in file sharing becoming more brazen. I'm sure that more sites will become more ardent in their desires to stick up to the big corporations, like the Pirate Bay does so very, very well.

But nine thousand dollars a song is bullshit.

And that's all I have to say on the matter.

Radiohead has it right. Pie in the face of those fools.

Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Oct 15, 2007
Another thing: access to Pandora is now restricted to residents of the United States, due to licensing constraints. I don't exactly know what this means because as far as I knew (and please, correct me if I'm wrong) the music they were using was actually provided by users. To my way of thinking, the music provided is already owned by users so why should there be licensing problems. As I understood it, Pandora doesn't allow users to copy music, but simply listen to music that is similar to their favourite bands.

Again, correct me if I'm wrong.
on Oct 15, 2007
Pandora doesn't allow users to copy music, but simply listen to music that is similar to their favourite bands.


No, that's exactly what it does. You can't download what you hear from Pandora, it just streams like a radio to your compy. But I've heard new stuff there, and then gone and purchased it.

That sucks that you can't hear it down there, Maso. Sorry.
on Jul 04, 2008

Youknow what I actually really don't know about recorded music, period.

on Jul 04, 2008
I see peer-to-peer file sharing, for instance, as stealing and something that needs to be controlled.


I agree. No amount of rationalizing will get around this fact.

No matter how one slices and dices it......"file sharing" is stealing.

Planning to buy it later (if you discover you like it) doesn't excuse the crime. This is what's known as "the end justifies the means". Does it?
3 Pages1 2 3